Indonesians’ development of democracy, at least four times Indonesia through democracy. The first is liberal democracy in the era of independence. Both are guided democracy, when President Sukarno dissolved constituent assembly and declared a guided democracy. Third is the Pancasila democracy which began in the reign of President Suharto. Fourth is a democracy today is still in a state of transition.
The advantages and disadvantages of each period of democracy is basically could provide valuable lessons for Indonesians’ citizen. Liberal democracy was at that time cannot provide meaningful change for Indonesia. However, various cabinet falls-up at that time have shown a wide range of personal and their thoughts are brilliant in the lead but it is easily overthrown or fallen down by the parliament with a vote of no confidence.
While guided democracy that declared by Sukarno, Sukarno's position has strengthened in absolute terms. On the other side, this impact on the authority of Indonesia in international forums that is shown by different maneuvers performed Sukarno and the emergence of Indonesia as one of military force to be reckoned with in Asia. But on the other side is less noticed aspect of people's economy due to various political policies of the time.
In other sides with the leadership of Soeharto's Pancasila democracy the stability of security is maintained resulting in the deprivation of freedom of speech. But the level of people's economic life is relatively good. However, the disease of corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN) getting worse plagued government. Government agencies in the legislative, executive and judicial corruption are exposed to the virus.
Democracy in Indonesia is still in a transitional period in which various achievements already appeared and accompanied by other achievement. For example, the emergence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) felt capable of deterrent effect corruptors by jailing a corruptor.


